Tuesday, August 16, 2016

Sphere of influence

Another sad thing has drawn me out of blog retirement.

Not Donald Trump sad — not that unwanted, bilious sensation of my soul being pickled. Peh!

This sadness nourishes the soul instead.

Lynne Rivers Roper died last week. I did not know her, except in words and pictures and sound.

First I knew her as Lynne Rivers, as she called herself on facebook®™, where I went to witness and discourse with swimmers from around the world.

"Great name for a swimmer," I thought, especially her kind of swimming, in the torrents and forest-bound rivers and pools of what she called the west country, the southwestern corner of England. Also, the heaving water of the English Channel.

Her swims always seemed to warrant great effort first, long hikes out of civilization into the woods of Elizabethan adventure novels, or climbs down the fossil-packed Devonian layers to the sea. Her Bit-O-Honey®-colored dog, named Honey, led the way and made it into most of the photos.

Lynne called it all "wild swimming," and described many of her jaunts in a blog, wildwomanswimming.

Immediately I liked the term, though almost as immediately I found some swimmers objected to it; swimming is swimming, some swimmers said.

You might not think such a thing controversial, but there you go.

It was the first time I was to get that Lynne was a bold spirit, even about so seemingly innocuous a matter.

Lynne was quite a writer, which I had taken to be just a really good thing she happened to do. But she was a writer writer, the breadth of which I am not fully familiar.

(Forgive me, personal friends of Lynne's, for my lack of knowledge; forgive me also, English friends of Lynne's, for my inevitable botch job on your geography and culture and politics herein.)

Of skinny dipping, for example, Lynne wrote:
Like every activity in our consumerist culture, wild swimming has become a lifestyle choice. It’s aspirational, and visually suited to glossy magazines luring city-folk with a country-living wet-dream. Can nudity possibly be a part of this? Skinny dipping is subversive in a more complex way than that of being cheeky and rebellious, not least in that you can’t sell kit to people who aren’t wearing anything. Once you’ve plunged yourself into a moorland brook on a sunny day, skinny-dipping becomes almost inevitable. What does this represent but the exposure of one’s body and soul to nature, a baptism, a metaphorical sloughing of the skin?
Pick any paragraph of Lynne's descriptions of swims or swimming — of the same swim in the same place meriting vastly different descriptions, or of keeping swim lessons available to English schoolchildren — and her words will dance before you.

I told her several times, though not enough, and she returned the compliment, despite my quite low dancing-word average.

Next I heard her on radio programs in the United Kingdom, speaking out for open-water swimming, and against an English culture that presented any open water as dangerous and not to be attempted. She became a frequent spokesperson for the Outdoor Swimming Society, a UK open-water advocacy group.

In time she became Lynne Roper online — I think she explained more people knew her by that name, so I'm not sure "Rivers" wasn't a nom de plume.

Over time, by tangent, I learned that she had been a paramedic until sidelined by injury, and that she had been an operations manager in the Royal Air Force, and a university instructor. I learned that she had had breast cancer.

Bold by nature, and emboldened by her health care and health scare experience, Lynne wrote frequently and passionately for the National Health Service in England, and against the Tory government of the United Kingdom for working to dismantle or privatize the NHS and make health care harder to get for those who can least afford life without.

Lynne and many other UK swimmers I met on facebook©™ taught me much about the political climate in Britain.

Time passed, and Lynne suddenly began asking facebook™® friends for advice about voice-recognition writing software. I didn't put much stock into it, and maybe it had nothing to do with Lynne's subsequent diagnosis of a brain tumor.

I inferred two things, though: Lynne was having trouble typing — but planned to write anyway.

And write she did. A new blog, Out of My Brains, poured out Lynne's frank, detailed and funny account of brain tumor diagnosis and treatment. I was going to say "unflinching," but I have a feeling even someone I took to be forthright and baldfaced was holding back just a bit, for the sake of family and friends and readers like me.

Her blog featured an x-ray image of the tumor. Lynne named the tumor "Hunt," after Jeremy Richard Streynsham Hunt, the British Secretary of State for Health, upon whom Lynne pinned blame for leading the wreckage of the National Health Service.

In stark terms, Lynne pointed out she was fortunate for health care that so many others may not be able to get.

Equally stark and matter of fact, Lynne said she would not live long. Maybe a year, probably less.

Lynne's last post in Out of My Brains was June 18, and she apologized at the top for typos. She described the dreadful effects of her treatment, her illness, a terrible day for her, for her parents.

She wrote of wanting to describe an idea for her treatment regimen in a later post.

I never knew Lynne personally, but I like to think I know enough that she would want people to remember her for the daily selfies sent from her hospice bed, her head shorn, her face thick from medicines, an angry lump and red scar on her right temple — and a piece of chocolate, melting and messy, held in her lips.

There must have been a good week and a half of these.

But I can't do it. I choose to remember Lynne, a real inspiration found in a virtual world, as she looked in the sea, shoulders above the water, her hair a dry (!) silver mop, her face to the sun, stretched wide in a smile.

After her death, friends filled facebook®™ with photos of her past, when it looks like she had chestnut hair.

It's easy to see, from back then and in the few years I knew her through words and pictures, Lynne lived for joy, for friends, for justice, for honesty, for care of others, for wild water and the chance for more people to share that joy. She lives on as one of those people who packed much more into life than the average person — who lives on in others because of it.

Some of her friends suggested giving to St. Luke's Hospice Plymouth, which cared for her in her last days. It seems absolutely fitting.

In the last few days, I have considered my own open water, not wild swimming by any means. Yesterday, wind under one of the bridges picked up the water, slapping my face, and I thought of Lynne.

Swim for her. Swim because of her.

Wednesday, June 8, 2016

Descent into madness

Few matters would return me to this blog.

One of them, God help us all, is Donald Trump.

The hypocrite behind the Teleprompter®™. The snake in the tall grass, the lipsticked pig, acting presidential, for Tuesday, anyway.

In writing, I revive the delusion that I can influence anyone who reads this. You have been few but faithful, and I'm guessing you stood in the choir with me, or are too polite to call me a misinformed ass.

Speaking of misinformed ass, Donald Trump. Don't let him become president.

I'm harboring my delusion once more that you might be among the few who (1) read this, and (2) might be voting for Trump.

Don't do it, I'm begging.

When last I wrote, months ago, I also drew Trump at the podium, a windmill of Trumpian bluster who morphed into the Nazi swastika.

That was back when Trump was mostly a sick joke.
Now he's a nightmare of ridiculous proportion.

(Although he still lends credence to my fervent hope he is playing a vast practical joke, set to implode the Republic party on the convention floor by exposing himself as a closet Clinton fan.)

The nation under Mitt Romney as president would have been tolerable. He revealed himself as an elitist snob at the worst time for his campaign against incumbent Barack Obama last election, but he had the chops to be president.

Trump is anything but presidential.

Except for the frown he makes during one-on-one interviews, when he says he's the least racist person that ever lived. The frown is presidential. It reminds me of what John Steinbeck said of a character in The Winter of our Discontent (ironic title), "pulling a frog face."

And Trump owns a lot of suits and ties. So there's that.

Make America great again? For whom? From whom? Trump has insulted and dumped on and denounced whole groups of Americans for pander and sport.

Women. Muslims. Mexicans. War heroes. People with disabilities. Iowa. He calls people names, referring to U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren "Pocahontas," then repeats the names, louder, when someone points out it's offensive.

He divides people and derides them, and invites followers to join in. To echo his own superlative rhetoric, he is the least presidential person in the history of the country.

Trump wants to be president of some of the United States — that which is rich and white and male, mostly. The beautiful people he doesn't make fun of.

Trump vows to build a wall against Mexico, and get Mexico to pay for it. He broadly brushes immigrants from Mexico as killers and rapists, conceding some of them might be good people, he doesn't know.

Then he says the Hispanics love him. Last week, at a rally, he congratulated "my African American," pointing to a man in the audience.

I picture him, his arm clutched close around "my African American's" neck, telling his smirking cronies, "Isn't he the greatest?" Then giving his African American a playful slap on the cheek.

Last week, Trump said the judge in a class-action suit against his Trump University is biased against him because the judge is Mexican (then "of Mexican heritage" when Trump repeatedly was told the judge is American, born in Indiana), and Trump wants to build that wall.

Next he said any Muslim judge would be biased against him, presumably because Trump blustered infamously about vowing to keep Muslims out of the country.

By extension, anyone Trump has denounced would be ineligible to preside in any lawsuit against him — and serve in any position in Trump's government? — because he would automatically be unfair to Trump, the xenophobe.

I guess that's going to make it easy for him to run the country.

Don't let Trump run the country.

If you can stomach the TV news lately, you get the nightly dollop of smiling Trump spokespeople spinning his spew into golden denial, of playing "I know you are, but what am I?" for the cable news circuit.

Trump is the bully who grabs your wrist, slaps your face with your own hand, and says, "Why you hitting yourself?! Quit hitting yourself! What's the matter with you?!"

He lies then denies it, even when shown the evidence.

Trump is a racist panderer, telling anyone what he wants to hear. He told California farmers last week there is no drought.

I get it. Government doesn't work. Federal government overreaches, the economy slogs along, too many people don't have good jobs, while politicians and banks run the country in spite of us. Society's a mess, problems abound.

I get that we're desperate for a solution.

Donald Trump, the divider, is not it. He is a new, bigger problem. His mission has been to lie openly and abashedly, to make you afraid and make you hate, to make himself king.

The solution is harder than that, and won't be found with this election alone. It will be found in the hard work of us taking responsibility for our role as citizens.

I get that Hillary Clinton is establishment, is Bill Clinton reincarnate, in too deep perhaps, bringing to the candidacy all the baggage of the Clinton presidency. I'm not sure I get all the vitriol against her; I think someone traveling a similar long road in government service accrues battle scars, makes colossal mistakes, gets off track from the ideal, if any ideal existed.

I think the hate for Clinton is more perception than proof, much of it manufactured and allowed to tendril like kudzu over everything, in the same way that unalloyed and instantaneous hatred for President Obama was made to fester.

But Hillary Clinton does not corral Americans with labels, and encourage others to denounce them.

Nor does Bernie Sanders, who if anything hates only what Trump represents, the privileged class who dance through loopholes like lariats at a Wild West show, and tell everyone else to make do with what little they don't own.
 
Opponents stuck "socialist" on Sanders like a "kick me!" sign from the start, and his ideas for free education seem wonderfully unworkable. But here's the thing: He's promoting ideas for America, one America, not for some of America.

Now I see Republican leaders one by one endorse Trump as their party's candidate, saying he says some things they can get behind, that this odd, angry, bamboozling bluster is just the Candidate Trump, to get votes, and the President Trump will be different. Which is the rationalization of the temporarily insane.

To support Trump, be you Republican official or average voter, is to support his racist, abusive rants, is to support putting whole peoples in a lower class with impunity.

No amount of lipstick can pretty this pig. No argument will explain away your support for this guy.

Don't let Trump be president. These are united states.